In May, changes to Google results were the consequence of a  change in how Google assesses quality content. 
           
            Google admitted that while no spam-related update had occurred,  there were changes to its core ranking algorithm in terms of how it processes  quality signals - in other words a "quality update".  
            It is hard to get any specifics from Google, but we know from  past statements that a page's quality is determined by a wide range of  individual factors.  We generally hear  about updates from website owners who have lost visibility speaking up.  This update seems to have affected many sites,  with some reporting declining visibility, while others have gained. This is in  line with the little information gleaned from Google, that they didn't go after  any particular class of sites or individual sites, but rather it was an update  of the overall ranking algorithm. 
             
             Although we are not able to give you any detailed advice, apart from  focusing on constantly making improvements to your website aimed at your users  and overall quality, in line with this,  we have summarised below advice from a Google  page containing guidance on how to build high-quality websites and although  published in 2011, still contains relevant advice on how to help ensure your website ranks well in Google ... 
            *** 
            (Excerpts from a Google article) 
               
              Search is a complicated and evolving art and science, so rather than focusing  on specific algorithmic tweaks, we encourage you to focus on delivering the  best possible experience for users.  
            What counts as a high-quality site?
            If you want  to step into Google's mindset, the questions below provide some guidance on how  we've been looking at the issue:  
            
              - Would you trust the information presented in this       article?
 
              - Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast       who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
 
              
              
              - Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or       redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different       keyword variations?
 
              - Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information       to this site?
 
              - Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or       factual errors?
 
              - Are the topics driven by genuine interests of       readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to       guess what might rank well in search engines?
 
              - Does the article provide original content or       information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
 
              - Does the page provide substantial value when       compared to other pages in search results?
 
              - How much quality control is done on content?
 
              - Does the article describe both sides of a story?
 
              - Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
 
              - Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a       large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so       that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care? 
 
              - Was the article edited well, or does it appear       sloppy or hastily produced?
 
              - For a health related query, would you trust       information from this site?
 
              - Would you recognize this site as an authoritative       source when mentioned by name?
 
              - Does this article provide a complete or       comprehensive description of the topic?
 
              - Does this article contain insightful analysis or       interesting information that is beyond obvious?
 
              - Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark,       share with a friend, or recommend?
 
              - Does this article have an excessive amount of ads       that distract from or interfere with the main content?
 
              - Would you expect to see this article in a printed       magazine, encyclopedia or book?
 
              - Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise       lacking in helpful specifics?
 
              - Are the pages produced with great care and attention       to detail vs. less attention to detail?
 
              - Would users complain when they see pages from this       site?
 
             
             
            What you can do?
            We  encourage you to keep questions like the ones above in mind as you focus on  developing high-quality content rather than trying to optimize for any  particular Google algorithm. 
             
            One other specific piece of guidance we've offered is that low-quality content  on some parts of a website can impact the whole site’s rankings, and thus  removing low quality pages, merging or improving the content of individual  shallow pages into more useful pages, or moving low quality pages to a  different domain could eventually help the rankings of your higher-quality  content. 
             
            We're continuing to work on additional algorithmic iterations to help  webmasters operating high-quality sites get more traffic from search. As you  continue to improve your sites, rather than focusing on one particular  algorithmic tweak, we encourage you to ask yourself the same sorts of questions  we ask when looking at the big picture.  
            *** 
            We would suggest that you take the time to go through your website and see if there are areas where you could improve the quality of the information you have provided and talk to us about any updates that you think could help with your website's searchability.             
              
              
             |